Plus One System Right For College Football

College Football Playoff a Necessity

Dec 9, 2008 Kellen Murphy

Given the numerous and public downfalls of the Bowl Championship Series, there is a growing outcry for a playoff in major college football. Is this the right way to go?

College Football Playoff Negatives

Unfortunately, a playoff does not crown the best team as champion. In College Basketball it is quite rare for the number one overall seed to actually win the tournament. In Major League Baseball, only three times in the past 20 years has the team with the best record won the World Series. Over the same time period, only 6 times has the NFL team with the best regular season record won the Super Bowl.

A true playoff rewards the hottest team, not necessarily the best team. It just so happens that right now, the two hottest teams are Oklahoma and Florida. Last year at this time, it was USC and Georgia, neither of whom was in the national title discussion and both of whom went on to romp their overmatched bowl opponents.

BCS Solution

This is where the “plus one” format comes in. To get into the top 4 in the BCS, you would have to play very well throughout the season. The plus one system only adds one more game for just two teams so for the vast majority of college football teams (117 out of 119 currently in the bowl subdivision) the schedule wouldn’t change.

The biggest advantage to the plus one system is it lets in the elite without worrying too much about a plucky underdog ruining the season of the best team in the country. They make great stories, but Cinderella doesn’t help the best team win the championship.

Take this year.

In a New Year’s Day Bowl, perhaps the Fiesta Bowl, Oklahoma would host Alabama since the Sooners finished atop the BCS and the Crimson Tide finished fourth. Then, in the Orange Bowl, Florida would host Texas. A week later, the winners would play off for the title.

Past Filled With BCS Controversy

It would help settle some controversy, but certainly not all. In 2005 Oklahoma was ambushed in the Orange Bowl 55-19 by USC while Auburn beat Virginia Tech in the Sugar Bowl 16-13 to finish 14-0. The Tigers had a legitimate claim that they should have played USC instead of the Sooners. This doesn’t mean at all that they would have beaten USC but simply that they deserved to play USC.

A plus one format would have proven which team was better. Under that format, 13-0 Oklahoma would have played 13-0 Auburn in the semi-final while 12-0 USC played 11-1 Texas. That way, it would have been impossible for two of the top three teams to finish undefeated.

Non-BCS Conference Teams in the BCS

There will always be proverbial flies in the proverbial ointment such as Utah crashing the party twice, Boise State once, and Hawaii once. It makes for a fun bowl season but are they the best of the best? No, they aren’t. If there’s ever going to be a playoff, it should be limited to four teams. That way, only the best get in and only the best come out.

The way it should be.

The copyright of the article Plus One System Right For College Football in Football is owned by Kellen Murphy. Permission to republish Plus One System Right For College Football in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
What do you think about this article?

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
post your comment
What is 6+1?

Comments

Dec 30, 2008 5:14 AM
Guest :
Well with a playoff, first off it gives the teams in the Sun Belt and conferences like that something to play for. And with a playoff, anything can happen, just as you said, but if a number 8 seed beats a number 1 seed, it proves that they're just as good as a number 2 or 3 seed.
1 Comment: